Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
Chatanthropic/claude-opus-4.6Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective for large codebases, complex refactors, and multi-step debugging that unfolds over time. The model shows deeper contextual understanding, stronger problem decomposition, and greater reliability on hard engineering tasks than prior generations.Beyond coding, Opus 4.6 excels at sustained knowledge work. It produces near-production-ready documents, plans, and analyses in a single pass, and maintains coherence across very long outputs and extended sessions. This makes it a strong default for tasks that require persistence, judgment, and follow-through, such as technical design, migration planning, and end-to-end project execution.
Providers
/v1/chat/completions/v1/responsesEjemplos de Código
import anthropicclient = anthropic.Anthropic(base_url="https://api.ofox.io/anthropic",api_key="YOUR_OFOX_API_KEY",)message = client.messages.create(model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.6",max_tokens=1024,messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],)print(message.content[0].text)
Disponibilidad y estado
Benchmarks
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 obtiene 1498 en la categoría general del ranking de texto de LMArena (control de estilo), ocupando el puesto 4 de 374 modelos según 63.487 votos de preferencia humana (actualizado el 2026-07-12).
| Categoría | Puntuación Arena | IC del 95% | Puesto | Votos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | 1494–1501 | N.º 4 de 374 | 63.487 | |
| Prompts difíciles | 1523–1532 | N.º 3 de 374 | 40.530 | |
| Programación | 1542–1554 | N.º 5 de 369 | 17.517 | |
| Matemáticas | 1493–1514 | N.º 5 de 362 | 3537 | |
| Escritura creativa | 1471–1485 | N.º 7 de 372 | 10.341 | |
| Seguimiento de instrucciones | 1494–1505 | N.º 4 de 374 | 20.410 | |
| Chino | 1536–1559 | N.º 3 de 344 | 3242 |
Fuente: LMArena · CC BY 4.0 · Actualizado el 2026-07-12 · Metodología ↗ · Los puestos comparan modelos dentro de cada categoría del ranking de texto de LMArena (control de estilo). Las puntuaciones provienen de evaluaciones de preferencia humana de terceros, no de OFOX.